|
Parliament’s recent
performance belies popular perception
The Times of India,
August 23, 2010
Amid the general hue
and cry against the massive increment and still sulking leaders
of some political parties, hard facts show that both the Houses
of Parliament have not performed as badly as is generally
perceived.
If we go through the
analysis done by the PRS Legislative Research of the last three
sessions of Parliament — Budget session 2009, Winter session
2009, Budget session 2010 (see graphic) — we find that MPs of
both the Houses worked for more than 80% of the scheduled hours
and on few occasions even more than 90%.
For instance, during
this year's budget session both the Houses sat late on several
days to discuss the railway and general budgets. The Rajya Sabha
also discussed the working of various ministries. Issues related
to inflation, Naxalism and census were also discussed besides
other legislation.
Lok Sabha worked for
66% of the scheduled hours, and Rajya Sabha for 74%. Several
hours were lost due to interruptions on controversial issues
like IPL, phone tapping, 2G spectrum allocation, Maoist menace
and inflation.
What does it mean in
real terms? Both the Houses had 32 of the 35 sittings planned.
Apart from finance and appropriation bill, both the houses could
pass only six of the 27 bills that were planned for the Budget
session. If we add the appropriation bills, altogether 16 bills
were passed. However, only 28 of the 64 bills could be
introduced.
The winter session
of 2009 saw the Lok Sabha working for 84% of the scheduled hours
and the Rajya Sabha for 81%. In fact, the sitting of RS was
extended by a day. Both Houses discussed the supplementary
demands for grants, government's position on climate change and
rise in prices of essential commodities besides other
legislation. Several hours were lost due to interruptions and
walkouts on critical issues like sugarcane pricing, Telangana,
Liberhan Report and inflation. However, out of 29 bills that
were planned to be passed, including appropriation bills, only
17 could be passed. Also, only 22 of the 62 bills could be
introduced.
In 2009 full-fledged
budget session took place in July after UPA-II came to power. A
new government and new MPs saw enthusiastic response from both
the Houses. In fact, the Lok Sabha worked 4% and the Rajya Sabha
worked 13% more than the scheduled time. In this 26-day session,
eight bills were passed and 17 were introduced (including
finance and appropriation bills). Both the Houses sat on all 26
days. As far as performance goes, only eight bills could be
passed whereas the plan was for 14 bills.
This news can also be viewed at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
|